Tôi đang phân vân giữa hai ống 75-300 và 55-200, xin các anh cho ý kiến về tính kinh tế, hiệu quả sử dụng...giữa 2 ống kính này.

Cảm ơn

-----------Reply---------
Mình nghĩ là anh cần nói rõ : Ống Kính Canon hay ống hiệu gì ? Mục đích anh sử dụng ?

Như vậy sẽ dễ dàng cho ngừoi trả lời & câu trả lời ngắn gọn, chính xác hơn.

-----------Reply---------

Quote:

Được gửi bởi EOS20D

Mình nghĩ là anh cần nói rõ : Ống Kính Canon hay ống hiệu gì ? Mục đích anh sử dụng ?

Như vậy sẽ dễ dàng cho ngừoi trả lời & câu trả lời ngắn gọn, chính xác hơn.

Xin lỗi, xin lỗi, tôi muốn mua ống tele chụp chơi thôi, thấy có hai ống kính này giá cả cũng ngang nhau, nên nhờ các anh cho ý kiến về tính kinh tế, hiệu quả sử dụng...
Cả 2 ống này đều là Canon EF.

-----------Reply---------

Quote:

EF 55-200/3.5-5.6 II

Another of Canon"s low end lenses. Originally designed to be sold with APS film cameras and then discontinued since APS never took off, it"s now back in a "mark II" version for use with the EOS 300D digital version of the "Rebel".

Plastic lens mount, no distance scales, no ring USM or full time manual focus (though it"s a USM lens, it"s a different type of USM). It does match the 18-55 in focal length (and probably in quality) but it"s a lens I"d have a hard time recommending on any basis except for price.

Theo như trên cho thấy , lens 55 -200 có plastic mount, không có distance scale, không có manual focus và chất lượng thường .

Quote:

EF 75-300/4-5.6

There are three of these, a non-USM version, a USM version and a USM version with IS (Image stabilization). Though the lens has a metal lens mount, it has no distance scale and the USM motor isn"t a ring type so it isn"t silent and you don"t get full time manual focus.

The USM version is probably marginally quieter and marginally faster focusing then the non-USM version. Optically all three lenses are very similar. The two non-IS lenses have identical optics but the IS lens has additional lenses as part of the IS mechanism.

All three lenses are very sharp at the short end but start to become a little soft at the long end. They"re still not bad - but not as good as a 300/4L lens. The IS version is one of my favorite lenses. You can shoot hand held at 300mm at speeds down to 1/125, maybe 1/90 and still get images which are sharp. At 300mm you have an "effective" 480mm lens compared to the view with a 35mm full frame camera which is very useful for sports and wildlife

Ống này được đánh giá nhỉnh hơn ống 55 -200 một tí .

Vậy theo mình, nếu anh chỉ muốn chụp chân dung "chơi " thôi, anh nên chọn ống 28 - 105 ( khi lắp vào máy canon EOS 20D thì thành 45 - 168 ). Có cho mình manual focus, rất hữu dụng ở nhiều tình huống auto focus bị nhiễu. Chưa kể tính năng distance scales và có metal mount .

Quote:

EF 28-105/3.5-4.5 USM

This is a workhorse 35mm lens, highly recommended as a relatively low cost, high quality alternative to Canon"s cheap "low end" lenses.

Much better built, ring USM motor with full time manual focus, distance scales, IR focus marks and a metal mount.

It takes 58mm filters. The only reservation is that 28mm isn"t all that wide on an EOS 300D or EOS 10D since it gives the same field of view as a 45mm lens on a full frame 35mm camera. If that"s not a problem for you this lens is maybe the best $220 you can spend.

Đây là lời khuyên tổng quát của tác giả :

Quote:

My Lens Recommendations for the EOS 300D and EOS 10D

There are dozens of possible lens combinations and the one that"s best for you depends on your particular needs and how much you want to spend. Here are three suggestions, but they are by no means the only good combinations.

I"d say that the best low cost solution would be the 18-55 coupled with a 50/1.8 and a 75-300. This gives you one wide-angle zoom, one telephoto zoom and one fast lens ideal for portrait work. I wouldn"t worry too much about the gap between 55mm and 75mm.

The best single lens solution is probably the 28-135 IS. It doesn"t go very wide (45mm equivalent), but it does go quite long (216mm equivalent) and it has image stabilization so you can hand hold the system in conditions where you"d need a tripod to get sharp shots with a non-IS lens. It"s a very sharp lens too! Of course I"d throw in a 50/1.8 for really low light work and portrait work where you want blurred backgrounds. Add the 18-55 if you need wide-angle. I know this is 3 lenses, but what"s two more cheap lenses between friends!

The best higher end solution might be the 24-85/3.5-4.5 coupled with the 70-200/4L. Both are high quality lenses, both take 67mm filters and they don"t overlap in range too much. Again, add the 50/1.8 for the reasons described above. You don"t get a really wide-angle lens, but for $100 you can add the 18-55 for use in the 18-24 range (29-38mm equivalent).

Cuối cùng : là quyết định của anh :beer_smil

-----------Reply---------
Điều cuối cùng quyết định là vợ tôi chứ không phải tôi :D

Những ý kiến rất hữu ích, xin cảm ơn các anh.

-----------Reply---------
cái 75-300 có vẻ chắc chắn hơn

nhưng cái 55-200 tôi thấy chụp cũng đẹp lắm, hồi xưa có và đã nhượng lại cho 1 bác ở HN

-----------Reply---------
-----------Reply---------
CongTroi.Com source from search & vnphoto.net